The Water Math · Evidence library
Do Your Own Math › The Water Math › Library › PFAS

Which filters take out PFAS ("forever chemicals")?

Reverse osmosis and two-stage under-sink filters removed 90% or more in field and lab studies, often to below detection. Pitcher and fridge filters averaged about half, with brands ranging from about 20% to 99%. Short-chain PFAS are harder for carbon. Certification and keeping to the cartridge life matter as much as the filter type.

The sources

SourceWhat it found (quoted) and its limitsEvidence
Mulhern R, Bynum ND, Liyanapatirana C, DeStefano N, Knappe D, Gibson JM. Longitudinal assessment of point-of-use carbon filters for removal of PFAS from private well water. AWWA Water Sci 3(6):e1262 (2021) · new
field longitudinal study · private wells, North Carolina, monthly x 8 months · n = 18 well users
influent sum PFAS 4.7-131 ng/L; filters removed 97%-99% of all influent PFAS incl. short-chain PFEAs for full rated lifetime; prevalence above reporting limits reduced 99.5%; above detection limits reduced 92% (abstract)
Limits: abstract only; low influent; one product type
Evidence: strong
Access unknown · source · added 2026-10-30
Herkert NJ, Merrill J, Peters C, Bollinger D, Zhang S, Hoffman K, Ferguson PL, Knappe DRU, Stapleton HM. Assessing the effectiveness of point-of-use residential drinking water filters for perfluoroalkyl substances (PFASs). Environ Sci Technol Lett 7:178-184 (2020) · new
field study in homes · Central + southeastern North Carolina · n = 73 homes; 89 filtered samples (76 POU, 13 POE)
RO and dual-stage: >=90% PFCA/PFSA removal; pitcher ~50% (long-chain ~61%, short-chain ~46%); refrigerator ~50%; faucet (n=2) >75%; single-stage under-sink >84% PFSAs but ~half PFCAs; AC filters short-chain avg ~41%; whole-house GAC: 4 of 8 systems showed increased PFAS after filtration
Limits: Convenience sample; small n per type (faucet n=2, countertop n=1); no link found to filter age (7.5 months avg); detection-limit capped removal %
Evidence: strong
Paywalled · source · added 2026-10-30
Teymoorian T, Dinh QT, Barbeau B, Sauvé S. Performance of pitcher-type POU filters for the removal of 75 PFAS from drinking water: comparing different water sources. Front Environ Chem 5 (2024) · new
lab + home test, real tap water · Saint-Donat and Montreal (Quebec) tap water · n = 5 pitcher products
background sum75 PFAS 13 and 56 ng/L; volume-weighted removal after 160 L: ZeroWater 99% / ~100%; ClearlyFiltered 99% / 96%; Aquagear 77% / 60%; Brita Elite 20% / 48%; Brita Standard 38% (Montreal); ZeroWater desorbed TDS/TOC after 80 L in Saint-Donat; Aquagear sulfate rose after 20 L
Limits: 2 waters only; low influent PFAS; Canadian waters
Evidence: moderate
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30
MacKeown H, Magi E, Di Carro M, Benedetti B. Removal of PFAS from tap water by means of point-of-use treatment: A review. Sci Total Environ 954:176764 (2024) · new
review (narrative, structured) · global literature to 2024 · n = 22 peer-reviewed papers (10 US; 5 real-life)
only 5 of 22 studies in real-life settings; summarises Herkert (RO/dual-stage >=90%, GAC short-chain 41%), Teymoorian pitchers 38-60% (3 filters) vs ~100% (2), EWG 22-100%; NSF challenge 2160 ng/L total requires >=99%; abstract: 'improperly maintained activated carbon systems might even raise PFAS levels'
Limits: Not a formal systematic review/meta-analysis; cites EWG (grey)
Evidence: moderate
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30
Choudhary K, Lanzarini-Lopes M, Parzen H, Perez Medina X, Reckhow D, Rogers R, Tobiason J, Wittbold P (UMass Amherst / MassDEP). PFAS Point-of-Use Treatment System Study, Final Report (2023) · new
government-funded on-site test with real well water · Townsend MA well water, mobile lab, spring 2022 · n = 17 devices
raw PFAS6 122.6 ng/L; at 100% rated throughput 5 of 17 below 20 ng/L MCL, 12 of 17 exceeded; PUR faucet 13.8 ng/L at 100% -> 32 ng/L at 200%; 3M plumbed-in, A.O. Smith plumbed-in, ZeroWater non-detect at 100% and 200%; annual cost $46-$176
Limits: One water source; only 2 sampling points per device; device count inconsistent (17 vs 20) in report
Evidence: moderate
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30
Patterson C, Burkhardt J, Schupp D, Krishnan ER, Dyment S, Merritt S, Zintek L, Kleinmaier D. Effectiveness of point-of-use/point-of-entry systems to remove PFAS from drinking water. AWWA Water Sci (2019) · new
lab treatability study (US EPA) with Widefield-aquifer-type test water · Fountain/Security/Widefield CO context · n = 3 RO units; 2 GAC media (RSSCT)
test water PFOS 1,600 ng/L, PFHxS 1,000, PFOA 800 ng/L; RO#1 and RO#3 all PFAS below detection; RO#2 6 of 42 samples detected (e.g. PFOS 77 ng/L, 94.3%; PFNA 49 ng/L, 76.7%) after shutdown/restart; GAC exceeded 70 ng/L PFOS+PFOA after ~4,800 BV (coconut, ~33 days at max-day conc) and ~2,900 BV (coal, ~20 days); EPA summary: RO non-detect '<3 ppt'
Limits: Short-duration tests; high challenge conc.; POE GAC modelled not field-tested
Evidence: moderate
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30
Zhang X, Wang D, Wang K, Yang Z, Ai M, Zhang Y. Legacy and novel PFAS in tap water from East China: impact from water sources and risk mitigation by household purifiers. Environ Sci Technol (2025) · new
monitoring + household purifier sampling · East China tap water · n = not stated in abstract
tap water up to 8970.3 ng/L; RO purifiers 'demonstrated near-complete removal for most PFAS' (no % in abstract)
Limits: abstract only; no numeric removal in abstract
Evidence: weak
Paywalled · source · added 2026-10-30
US EPA Office of Water. Identifying Drinking Water Filters Certified to Reduce PFAS (web guidance) (2024) · new
government guidance · US · n = n/a
GAC/IX cost $20-$1,000, RO $150-$1,000; RO wastes ~1 gallon per gallon treated; as of April 2024 certification standards 'do not yet show removal to the levels of EPA's new drinking water standard'
Limits: Guidance, no primary data
Evidence: weak
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30
He A, Lu Y, Chen F, et al. Exploring the origin of efficient adsorption of PFAS in household point-of-use water purifiers: joint experimental and computational study. Sci Total Environ (2022) · new
in-field + lab mechanistic · Chinese tap water (homes) · n = not stated in abstract
in-field removal 21%-99% of 14 PFAS (influent/effluent ratio); hydrophobicity key factor
Limits: abstract only; n not given; China
Evidence: weak
Access unknown · source · added 2026-10-30
NC Dept of Environmental Quality, Div. of Waste Management. GAC System Pilot Study handout (Chemours/GenX private wells) (2018) · new
government field pilot · Cape Fear region private wells, NC · n = 6 homes
raw GenX 159-1,910 ng/L; use 450-2,500 gal/week; no effluent numbers in handout
Limits: Interim handout only; results posted elsewhere; not peer reviewed
Evidence: weak
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30
Minnesota Department of Health (Water Science & Marketing / WQA). MDH Evaluation of Point-of-Use Water Treatment Devices for Perfluorochemical Removal, Final Report Summary (2008) · new
government lab + field test · Oakdale and St. Paul Park MN well water · n = 14 selected; 11 field-tested (4 AC, 7 RO)
all RO removed PFCs below reporting limit 0.2 µg/L; AC field: all 4 below 0.2 µg/L; lab: PFBA breakthrough Kenmore at 500 gal (0.2-0.7 µg/L), Kinetico at 250 gal (1.4-2.2 µg/L at 500 gal)
Limits: Old (2008); reporting limit 0.2 µg/L = 200 ng/L, far above current 4 ng/L MCLs; only 3 PFAS
Evidence: weak
Free to read · source · added 2026-10-30

Evidence grade: strong = trials, large field studies or official datasets; moderate = smaller or lab studies with real water; weak = single small studies, makers' specs or secondary reports. "Free to read" means the source itself is free to read online.

Other themes

All themes in the evidence library →